←back to thread

560 points bearsyankees | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
edm0nd ◴[] No.43965336[source]
> I have been met with radio silence.

Thats when its time to inform them you are dumping the vuln to the public in 90 days due to their silence.

replies(3): >>43965359 #>>43965374 #>>43965518 #
hbn ◴[] No.43965374[source]
That's more of a punishment to innocent users than the business
replies(3): >>43965381 #>>43965519 #>>43966199 #
nick238 ◴[] No.43965519[source]
Disclosure is good for the 'innocent users' as they are made aware that their data may have been leaked (who knows if the company can do the sufficient auditing and forensics to detect total scraping), rather than just being oblivious because the company just didn't bother to tell them.
replies(2): >>43966025 #>>43966247 #
1. kube-system ◴[] No.43966247[source]
> Disclosure is good for the 'innocent users' as they are made aware that their data may have been leaked

Presuming perfect communication which is never the case for security vulnerabilities on a consumer application.