←back to thread

451 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jhaile ◴[] No.43964361[source]
One aspect that I feel is ignored by the comments here is the geo-political forces at work. If the US takes the position that LLMs can't use copyrighted work or has to compensate all copyright holders – other countries (e.g. China) will not follow suit. This will mean that US LLM companies will either fall behind or be too expensive. Which means China and other countries will probably surge ahead in AI, at least in terms of how useful the AI is.

That is not to say that we shouldn't do the right thing regardless, but I do think there is a feeling of "who is going to rule the world in the future?" tha underlies governmental decision-making on how much to regulate AI.

replies(10): >>43964511 #>>43964513 #>>43964544 #>>43964546 #>>43964647 #>>43964799 #>>43965877 #>>43966756 #>>43969913 #>>43974233 #
bgwalter ◴[] No.43964511[source]
The same president that is putting 145% tariffs on China could put 1000% tariffs on Internet chat bots located in China. Or order the Internet cables to be cut as a last resort (citing a national emergency as is the new practice).

I'm not sure at all what China will do. I find it likely that they'll forbid AI at least for minors so that they do not become less intelligent.

Military applications are another matter that are not really related to these copyright issues.

replies(2): >>43964580 #>>43965149 #
pc86 ◴[] No.43964580[source]
How exactly does one add a tariff to a foreign-based chat bot?
replies(2): >>43964611 #>>43965573 #
1. Ekaros ◴[] No.43965573{3}[source]
Build a big firewall. And then fine massively any ISP that allows traffic to reach bad hosts...