←back to thread

451 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
tempeler ◴[] No.43962475[source]
I think, A new chapter is about to begin. It seems that in the future, many IPs will become democratized — in other words, they will become public assets.
replies(7): >>43962496 #>>43962547 #>>43962564 #>>43962738 #>>43963359 #>>43964145 #>>43966881 #
kmeisthax ◴[] No.43963359[source]
They aren't going to legalize, say, publishing Mario fangames or whatever. They're just going to make copyright allow AI training, because AI is what the owner class wants. That's not democratizing IP, that's just prejudicial (dis)enforcement against the creative class.
replies(1): >>43963594 #
jobigoud ◴[] No.43963594[source]
Millions of pages of fan fic based on existing IP have been written. There is a point where it doesn't really make sense trying to go after individuals especially if they make no money out of it.

If we enter a world where anyone can create a new Mario game and there are thousands of them released on the public web it would be impossible for the rights holders to do anything, and it would be a PR bad move to go after individuals doing it for fun.

replies(2): >>43963708 #>>43966514 #
1. int_19h ◴[] No.43963708[source]
Imagine a world where all models capable of creating a new Mario game from scratch are only available through cloud providers which must implement mandatory filters such that asking "write me a Mario clone" (or anything functionally equivalent) gets you a lecture on don't-copy-that-floppy.

Bad PR? The entire copyright enforcement industry has had bad PR pretty much since easy copying enabled grassroots piracy - i.e. since before computers even. It never stopped them. What are you going to do about it? Vote? But all the mainstream parties are onboard with the copyright lobby.