←back to thread

146 points MaysonL | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.274s | source
Show context
gotoeleven ◴[] No.43959536[source]
I didn't look at every one on the list of these 1000 NSF grants that were cancelled:

https://airtable.com/appGKlSVeXniQZkFC/shrFxbl1YTqb3AyOO?jnt...

but I think if you skim the titles you can sense a theme.

Here's the very first one: "Cambio: A Professional Development Approach for Building Latinx-focused Cultural Competence in Informal Science Education Institutions" for a whopping 2.8 million dollars.

This is not basic research, this is not important research, this is left wing politics parasitically attached to scientific institutions.

replies(14): >>43959617 #>>43959696 #>>43959698 #>>43959756 #>>43959866 #>>43959886 #>>43959911 #>>43959942 #>>43960873 #>>43961611 #>>43962211 #>>43962669 #>>43962754 #>>43963624 #
eli_gottlieb ◴[] No.43959942[source]
Can you show that the left-wing politics added up to 55% of the NSF's total budget and stretched across all 37 of its directorates? Because those are what's getting cut.
replies(2): >>43960016 #>>43960521 #
fallingknife ◴[] No.43960521[source]
Is that your standard here? It has to be 55% to be a problem? If someone working for me diverted 1% of their company budget to political nonsense then that would be their last act as an employee. If you are mandated to spend taxpayer money on science and you spend any of it on garbage like that, you are stealing from the public.
replies(2): >>43960768 #>>43963153 #
1. eli_gottlieb ◴[] No.43963153[source]
My standard is that the funding cuts have to hit the political nonsense and leave the things that aren't political nonsense. Otherwise I'm going to count them as simple funding cuts, not a crackdown on political nonsense.