←back to thread

451 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
andy99 ◴[] No.43962064[source]
Two different issues that while apparently related need separate consideration. Re the copyright finding, does the US copyright office have standing to make such a determination? Presumably not since various claims about AI and copyright are before the courts. Why did they write this finding?
replies(3): >>43962165 #>>43962326 #>>43962443 #
1. kklisura ◴[] No.43962165[source]
> The Office is releasing this pre-publication version of Part 3 in response to congressional inquiries and expressions of interest from stakeholders

They acknowledge the issue is before courts:

> These issues are the subject of intense debate. Dozens of lawsuits are pending in the United States, focusing on the application of copyright’s fair use doctrine. Legislators around the world have proposed or enacted laws regarding the use of copyrighted works in AI training, whether to remove barriers or impose restrictions

Why did they write the finding: I assume it's because it's their responsibility:

> Pursuant to the Register of Copyrights’ statutory responsibility to “[c]onduct studies” and “[a]dvise Congress on national and international issues relating to copyright,”...

All excerpts are from https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell...