←back to thread

310 points skarat | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.4s | source

Things are changing so fast with these vscode forks I m barely able to keep up. Which one are you guys using currently? How does the autocomplete etc, compare between the two?
1. fastball ◴[] No.43960136[source]
For the agentic stuff I think every solution can be hit or miss. I've tried claude code, aider, cline, cursor, zed, roo, windsurf, etc. To me it is more about using the right models for the job, which is also constantly in flux because the big players are constantly updating their models and sometimes that is good and sometimes that is bad.

But I daily drive Cursor because the main LLM feature I use is tab-complete, and here Cursor blows the competition out of the water. It understands what I want to do next about 95% of the time when I'm in the middle of something, including comprehensive multi-line/multi-file changes. Github Copilot, Zed, Windsurf, and Cody aren't at the same level imo.

replies(1): >>43960573 #
2. solumunus ◴[] No.43960573[source]
If we’re talking purely auto complete I think Supermaven does it the best.
replies(2): >>43960635 #>>43967757 #
3. fastball ◴[] No.43960635[source]
Cursor bought Supermaven last year.
replies(1): >>43961610 #
4. xmorse ◴[] No.43961610{3}[source]
It still works
replies(1): >>43962091 #
5. freehorse ◴[] No.43962091{4}[source]
Do they actually improve the model you can get without cursor? Or in reality all the development goes to cursor's autocomplete without making this available to supermaven subscribers? It is hard to make sure of that from their website and lack of info online.