←back to thread

146 points MaysonL | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.033s | source
Show context
gotoeleven ◴[] No.43959536[source]
I didn't look at every one on the list of these 1000 NSF grants that were cancelled:

https://airtable.com/appGKlSVeXniQZkFC/shrFxbl1YTqb3AyOO?jnt...

but I think if you skim the titles you can sense a theme.

Here's the very first one: "Cambio: A Professional Development Approach for Building Latinx-focused Cultural Competence in Informal Science Education Institutions" for a whopping 2.8 million dollars.

This is not basic research, this is not important research, this is left wing politics parasitically attached to scientific institutions.

replies(14): >>43959617 #>>43959696 #>>43959698 #>>43959756 #>>43959866 #>>43959886 #>>43959911 #>>43959942 #>>43960873 #>>43961611 #>>43962211 #>>43962669 #>>43962754 #>>43963624 #
eli_gottlieb ◴[] No.43959942[source]
Can you show that the left-wing politics added up to 55% of the NSF's total budget and stretched across all 37 of its directorates? Because those are what's getting cut.
replies(2): >>43960016 #>>43960521 #
1. fsckboy ◴[] No.43960016[source]
>Can you show that the left-wing politics added up to 55% of the NSF's total budget

55% of academia left-wing and/or marketing to left wing bureaucrats? is that even not possible? that was true in the Reagan era before the Clinton era put it on steroids.

replies(1): >>43960053 #
2. eli_gottlieb ◴[] No.43960053[source]
Ok, so show me, using the sources given above and available via the NSF website, that 55% of the NSF's total budget is spent promoting left-wing politics instead of real science.
replies(1): >>43960378 #
3. eli_gottlieb ◴[] No.43963176{3}[source]
> you believe that evidence is important. I have not declared that

If you wanna believe government rationales for their actions until proven otherwise, you go ahead with that.

Sucker.