←back to thread

146 points MaysonL | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.421s | source
Show context
gotoeleven ◴[] No.43959536[source]
I didn't look at every one on the list of these 1000 NSF grants that were cancelled:

https://airtable.com/appGKlSVeXniQZkFC/shrFxbl1YTqb3AyOO?jnt...

but I think if you skim the titles you can sense a theme.

Here's the very first one: "Cambio: A Professional Development Approach for Building Latinx-focused Cultural Competence in Informal Science Education Institutions" for a whopping 2.8 million dollars.

This is not basic research, this is not important research, this is left wing politics parasitically attached to scientific institutions.

replies(14): >>43959617 #>>43959696 #>>43959698 #>>43959756 #>>43959866 #>>43959886 #>>43959911 #>>43959942 #>>43960873 #>>43961611 #>>43962211 #>>43962669 #>>43962754 #>>43963624 #
userbinator ◴[] No.43959617[source]
Besides the usual DEI stuff, some of those titles sound like the output of a stochastic generator trained on buzzwords:

"HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Using Peer-Enhanced Blockchain-Based Learning Environments to Promote Student Engagement and Retention"

"Blockchain-Based Learning Environments". That's my WTF of the day.

replies(3): >>43959708 #>>43959858 #>>43959970 #
1. lumost ◴[] No.43959970[source]
I wonder how much of this is “don’t hat the player, hate the game.”

As a society, we decided that academics must get funding outside of their department. We also chose that funding bodies liked blockchain for reasons unknown. There is probably a professor somewhere who is working on peer incentives to support education, and realized the work would get funded if they stored the incentives in a blockchain rather than a database. If this professor had stronger professional ethics - someone else would have the same realization.

Is it the professor, the department, or the funding agencies fault?

replies(1): >>43960014 #
2. huijzer ◴[] No.43960014[source]
> Is it the professor, the department, or the funding agencies fault?

Like so many things that are being turned upside down nowadays, I think the author already answers it:

> Before we go any further, let me be clear: this isn’t about […] ideologies.

The author did not give arguments for this claim.