←back to thread

232 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ljf ◴[] No.43947293[source]
Looks like this needs updating now https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chinese-cargo-seattle-tari...
replies(5): >>43947341 #>>43947367 #>>43947401 #>>43947511 #>>43947709 #
kristjansson ◴[] No.43947401[source]
> In fact, the Northwest Seaport Alliance … said it was so far seeing more vessels call into port in 2025 than in 2024, with three more calls in the first quarter of 2025 than during the same period in 2024.

> However, the ships calling into port were arriving with unpredictable volumes of cargo — sometimes 30% less than anticipated

And Snopes felt comfortable rating “mostly false” to the top level claim? I get that they’re trying to navigating treacherous waters, but “there’s still ships, they’re just 1/3 empty” is as much support for the top level claim as it is contradiction

replies(5): >>43947547 #>>43947638 #>>43947689 #>>43947726 #>>43947985 #
lurk2 ◴[] No.43947726[source]
If I drink 30% of a glass of water, is the glass of water empty?
replies(4): >>43947739 #>>43947870 #>>43947871 #>>43948122 #
Retric ◴[] No.43947870[source]
These aren’t static systems.

Keep removing 1 cup of water and add 2/3 cups and eventually it goes to zero. For a port that very well may be sending people home early on an ‘empty’ port. Even if tomorrow brings in new ships for now it looks like a ghost town.

And then at one port on one day zero cargo ships showed up.

replies(1): >>43947933 #
1. lurk2 ◴[] No.43947933{3}[source]
> These aren’t static systems.

That is irrelevant.