←back to thread

232 points pseudolus | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
snozolli ◴[] No.43947299[source]
I find it odd that recent articles are always about the Port of Seattle. From a quick Google search, it looks like the busiest US ports are Los Angeles, Long Beach, Port of New York, Port of Savannah, then Port of Seattle. As of 2018, the Port of Los Angeles alone was almost 3x busier than the Port of Seattle.

Not that it isn't worth noting, but I'm much more interested in overall volume across all of the nation's ports, and especially the West Coast ports.

replies(10): >>43947342 #>>43947345 #>>43947352 #>>43947358 #>>43947371 #>>43947419 #>>43947431 #>>43947578 #>>43947972 #>>43949035 #
marcosdumay ◴[] No.43947345[source]
I have been looking for an explanation to the US empty ports news. The best one I came with is that ships have been switching their destination ports to some that they could reach before the tariffs or some that have available tariff-free storage where the cargo can stay until Trump backpedals.

The total cargo volume seems to be falling only now, what still may be just noise.

replies(3): >>43947361 #>>43947470 #>>43947703 #
1. Cerium ◴[] No.43947703[source]
My understanding is that ship tarrifs are calculated at the time of departure, not arrival. This supports the delayed volume reduction since we see the change 22 to 40 days delayed (Pacific transit time).
replies(1): >>43948679 #
2. roxolotl ◴[] No.43948679[source]
These in particular are calculated based on time of departure. I don’t believe that’s the common case though.