←back to thread

'We Currently Have No Container Ships,' Seattle Port Says

(www.newsweek.com)
232 points pseudolus | 1 comments | 10 May 25 15:49 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
snozolli ◴[10 May 25 17:23 UTC] No.43947299[source]▶
I find it odd that recent articles are always about the Port of Seattle. From a quick Google search, it looks like the busiest US ports are Los Angeles, Long Beach, Port of New York, Port of Savannah, then Port of Seattle. As of 2018, the Port of Los Angeles alone was almost 3x busier than the Port of Seattle.

Not that it isn't worth noting, but I'm much more interested in overall volume across all of the nation's ports, and especially the West Coast ports.

replies(10): >>43947342 #>>43947345 #>>43947352 #>>43947358 #>>43947371 #>>43947419 #>>43947431 #>>43947578 #>>43947972 #>>43949035 #
1. bobthepanda ◴[10 May 25 17:38 UTC] No.43947419[source]▶
IIRC there was some speculation that a dip in container volumes would lead to less calls at smaller ports since there would be more room available at larger ports, and reducing port calls both reduces fees and travel times.