←back to thread

248 points johnshades | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.275s | source
Show context
sherdil2022 ◴[] No.43939373[source]
This can happen to anyone. Why is there no widespread concern or consternation about what the 1998 movie ‘enemy of the state’ predicted to happen?
replies(10): >>43939394 #>>43939396 #>>43939441 #>>43939554 #>>43939601 #>>43939678 #>>43939704 #>>43939874 #>>43940073 #>>43942628 #
wizzwizz4 ◴[] No.43939396[source]
There is widespread concern. It's just not reported, because that's not a news story. If you're in the US, get together with your local community and do something about this (e.g. establish / repurpose a neighbourhood watch), before it's too late.
replies(3): >>43939440 #>>43939687 #>>43940710 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.43939440[source]
> There is widespread concern. It's just not reported, because that's not a news story.

No, it is annews story, and widepsread concerns are often reported on; its not widely reported on because the media is a mix of institutiins which tend to be either in support of the Administration doing it or in fear of being targeted in retaliation for reporting on topics like that.

replies(2): >>43939506 #>>43939541 #
wizzwizz4 ◴[] No.43939541[source]
"Study finds it's a widespread concern" is a news story – for example: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-01925-3

> Notably, 69% of the global population expresses a willingness to contribute 1% of their personal income, 86% endorse pro-climate social norms and 89% demand intensified political action. […] Despite these encouraging statistics, we document that the world is in a state of pluralistic ignorance, wherein individuals around the globe systematically underestimate the willingness of their fellow citizens to act.

The situation is similar in the US: the majority of people don't think the government should be kidnapping citizens from their homes and shipping them off to foreign prisons without trial, but they also think everyone else is okay with it.

"It's a widespread concern" is not a news story, unless and until someone does the research and confirms it. Otherwise, how do the journalists know it's the case? And investigative journalists aren't usually running large-scale population studies.

replies(1): >>43943729 #
1. ZeroGravitas ◴[] No.43943729[source]
It could be argued that the corruption of news media is the reason that the masses who support, and have always supported, climate action believe that it's not a widespread belief.

I'd argue it's fairly directly responsible for the small number who don't support climate action too.

And I think the same applies to governments kidnapping people and ignoring courts who tell them it's illegal.