←back to thread

209 points Luc | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
omneity ◴[] No.43935797[source]
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
krapp ◴[] No.43935812[source]
That's still far slower than a human being, and those bins are far too neat.
replies(6): >>43935853 #>>43935860 #>>43935901 #>>43935930 #>>43936128 #>>43936289 #
usrusr ◴[] No.43936128[source]
It's not about throughput per unit, it's about throughput per unit of cost.

If five cheap robots outperform a single skilled worker, robots win. But depending on jurisdiction, those five robots might still lose to a dozen or so slaves kept near starvation. For the skilled worker it's bad news one way or the other.

replies(1): >>43936171 #
bluGill ◴[] No.43936171[source]
What skilled worker? This is a low skill worker they are replacing.
replies(3): >>43936207 #>>43936211 #>>43937833 #
usrusr ◴[] No.43937833[source]
Skilled. Not pedigree-filtered and trained and certified into a scarcity that may or may not actually be natural. Chances are most doctors or lawyers or software engineers would perform rather sub-par picking and putting in a warehouse.
replies(1): >>43939268 #
1. bluGill ◴[] No.43939268{3}[source]
Day one yes. put us in the warehouse for a few months and we would be as good as everyone. I'm guessing the woule only give a few days of training before setting us loose.

Several months of me as a doctor and I'd still be incompetent.