←back to thread

209 points Luc | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.278s | source
Show context
omneity ◴[] No.43935797[source]
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
krapp ◴[] No.43935812[source]
That's still far slower than a human being, and those bins are far too neat.
replies(6): >>43935853 #>>43935860 #>>43935901 #>>43935930 #>>43936128 #>>43936289 #
bluGill ◴[] No.43936289[source]
Neat is very important for consistent performance.

A restaurant can improve performance during the "lunch rush" by letting neat slip, but that carelessness is already costing them performance at the end of the lunch rush - this works because just as this catches up they get several hours in the afternoon to clean things up. Then supper crowd where they do it again - then they have the rest of the night to clean up from that. (the restaurants I worked in didn't have a breakfast rush, YMMV)

A factory by contrast needs to keep things neat and consistent all the time because there is never a rush/downtime. They want things rolling off the line at a consistent pace all day. Any compromise for speed now is a cost latter in the day.

I have never been in an Amazon warehouse so I don't have great insight into what things are like. I would expect they want to be more consistent all day - but I don't know. Maybe all the trucks arrive at once and then they get time when they are gone to clean up. I wouldn't expect that, but maybe.

replies(1): >>43936562 #
zaphar ◴[] No.43936562[source]
Slow is fast is a saying for a reason. It is just as true for a human as it is for a robot.
replies(2): >>43937354 #>>43938925 #
1. potato3732842 ◴[] No.43937354[source]
Like every other Reddit-ism and internet worshipped rule of thumb. The reason for the popularity has far more to do with what makes a sound byte marketable to humans than it does with anything quantitative.

Look at the above restaurant example, the system has a built in buffer to handle spikes so it can be cheaper or make other tradeoffs everywhere else compared to an equivalently performant system that can do 100% duty cycle.

A robot or human that can deal with messy inventory is facilitating positive tradeoffs elsewhere in the system.