←back to thread

Amazon's Vulcan Robots Now Stow Items Faster Than Humans

(spectrum.ieee.org)
209 points Luc | 1 comments | 09 May 25 11:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
omneity ◴[09 May 25 11:53 UTC] No.43935797[source]▶
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
krapp ◴[09 May 25 11:56 UTC] No.43935812[source]▶
That's still far slower than a human being, and those bins are far too neat.
replies(6): >>43935853 #>>43935860 #>>43935901 #>>43935930 #>>43936128 #>>43936289 #
usrusr ◴[09 May 25 12:46 UTC] No.43936128[source]▶
It's not about throughput per unit, it's about throughput per unit of cost.

If five cheap robots outperform a single skilled worker, robots win. But depending on jurisdiction, those five robots might still lose to a dozen or so slaves kept near starvation. For the skilled worker it's bad news one way or the other.

replies(1): >>43936171 #
bluGill ◴[09 May 25 12:51 UTC] No.43936171[source]▶
What skilled worker? This is a low skill worker they are replacing.
replies(3): >>43936207 #>>43936211 #>>43937833 #
DrillShopper ◴[09 May 25 12:56 UTC] No.43936207[source]▶
For now.

Wait until LLMs get better and destroy the ability for junior developers to get their foot in the door.

replies(1): >>43936439 #
warrenmiller ◴[09 May 25 13:21 UTC] No.43936439[source]▶
How do you get senior developers if you replace the junior developers?
replies(5): >>43936556 #>>43936606 #>>43936756 #>>43937741 #>>43946724 #
1. mystified5016 ◴[09 May 25 13:38 UTC] No.43936606[source]▶
You don't, you slowly cannibalize your business and industry. By the time consequences show up, you've already jumped ship with your golden parachute