←back to thread

209 points Luc | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.45s | source
Show context
omneity ◴[] No.43935797[source]
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
1. raisedbyninjas ◴[] No.43936383[source]
It appears this bot could be about 100 times simpler if they just had storage racks with smaller cubbies at the modest expense of usable storage volume. 1 item per cubbie.
replies(2): >>43937535 #>>43942783 #
2. rahimnathwani ◴[] No.43937535[source]
That would be a huge expense. You would either waste a lot of space in each one, or have the robot waste time finding one that's the optimal size.
3. dehugger ◴[] No.43942783[source]
Generally speaking space is the most valuable commodity in a warehouse (up to a certain height).

A robot that costs 5x as much but yields 30% more usable space is a better value proposition.

Also you wouldn't be able to accommodate anything besides items that fit in that specific pick bin (what a cubbie is called in the industry), meaning you would always need a near perfect match of # of bins of a specific size to the # of products matching them. It would be a continual battle to change racking as products move in and out of the warehouse.

A more complicated robot is a better robot, in this case.