←back to thread

209 points Luc | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
omneity ◴[] No.43935797[source]
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
krapp ◴[] No.43935812[source]
That's still far slower than a human being, and those bins are far too neat.
replies(6): >>43935853 #>>43935860 #>>43935901 #>>43935930 #>>43936128 #>>43936289 #
dlt713705 ◴[] No.43935901[source]
The challenge is not only stowing objects. It is also optimizing space and keeping it clean. In that matter robots are faster and better.
replies(1): >>43935960 #
krapp ◴[] No.43935960[source]
Optimizing space and trying to keep things neat is a futile effort. Pickers and counters are constantly pulling things out of the bins and putting them back in, and during high demand it's a chaotic mess. If there are going to be robots being this meticulous at every step of the process, then it's too slow.

There's a reason human beings are worked to the point of exhaustion in these warehouses - the goal is to move as much product as fast as possible. Quality and productivity are at cross purposes, and between the two only the latter makes money.

replies(1): >>43935998 #
dlt713705 ◴[] No.43935998[source]
That is why, in the end, only robots will remain. They are inexhaustible and strictly meticulous in all circumstances.
replies(2): >>43936008 #>>43936350 #
krapp ◴[] No.43936008[source]
Robots aren't inexhaustible. They break down a lot and are far more expensive to repair and maintain than a human being.
replies(4): >>43936065 #>>43936342 #>>43936370 #>>43936458 #
1. bigtunacan ◴[] No.43936342[source]
I agree robots breakdown a lot, however if you think robots are more expensive to maintain you may want to take a look at the cost of American medical costs.