←back to thread

209 points Luc | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
omneity ◴[] No.43935797[source]
Warehouses is definitely not where I expected robots with retractable blades to first appear.

The demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXco05eK28

replies(6): >>43935812 #>>43936173 #>>43936230 #>>43936383 #>>43936648 #>>43936751 #
krapp ◴[] No.43935812[source]
That's still far slower than a human being, and those bins are far too neat.
replies(6): >>43935853 #>>43935860 #>>43935901 #>>43935930 #>>43936128 #>>43936289 #
1. wielebny ◴[] No.43935853[source]
Slower than a human making one operation.

Not slower than human stocking items for a whole day.

replies(2): >>43935878 #>>43936122 #
2. vntok ◴[] No.43935878[source]
Surely the robot does not stop at the end of the day.
replies(2): >>43935950 #>>43936067 #
3. nosrepa ◴[] No.43935950[source]
The article says they plan on it operating continuously for 20 hours at a time.
4. CoastalCoder ◴[] No.43936067[source]
Until they unionize.
replies(1): >>43936135 #
5. dataviz1000 ◴[] No.43936122[source]
The tortoise and hare allegory? Slow and steady wins the race.
6. ta1243 ◴[] No.43936135{3}[source]
Do robots rely on being ionized? I'd have thought a robot which wasn't ionized would work just fine
replies(1): >>43936177 #
7. CoastalCoder ◴[] No.43936177{4}[source]
You're thinking of "Onionized", when their exploits are covered by one of the world's best publications.
replies(1): >>43937078 #
8. cusaitech ◴[] No.43937078{5}[source]
Are you talking about the "Soviet Onion"?