←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chirau ◴[] No.43928761[source]
I am sure a certain somebody is going to claim credit for bringing the papacy home to America to make it great.
replies(3): >>43928813 #>>43928854 #>>43929594 #
jm4 ◴[] No.43929594[source]
It's only a matter of time before that same person gets called out by the new pope and responds by calling him a loser. If we're lucky, that will be the catalyst that finally erodes any remaining support he has.
replies(1): >>43929972 #
doomroot13 ◴[] No.43929972[source]
Don't hold your breath. My whole family are staunch Catholics and disliked Francis because of his more "liberal" leanings. Some Catholics believed he was the "anti-christ" and loved Trump. Seriously.
replies(3): >>43930140 #>>43930379 #>>43930806 #
quesera ◴[] No.43930379[source]
I'm pretty sure you cease to be a Catholic when you call the Pope the anti-Christ. Infallible, God's representative on Earth, etc.

Though in USAmerica, we're pretty flexible on the meaning of "Christian" anyway. Certainly the loudest proclaimers have no resemblance whatsoever to the expected meaning.

Those troublesome CINOs.. Gosh Darn them to Heck.

replies(3): >>43930989 #>>43931474 #>>43934780 #
1. graemep ◴[] No.43934780[source]
> I'm pretty sure you cease to be a Catholic when you call the Pope the anti-Christ. Infallible, God's representative on Earth, etc.

Infallible (i.e. with the authority of a church council) only when speaking ex-cathedra on matters of church doctrine. Its never clear what it applies to and its very rarely generally accepted (maybe once every 200 years or so) that it applies to a particular teaching: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility#Frequency_...