←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
smnrg ◴[] No.43931723[source]
Many Italian newspapers (example: IlPost) and, I suspect, many non-US media, report this as “the second American Pope, the first from the USA.”

Which, I think, is fair, as South and Latin are also America. And so is Canada. And so was Francis.

But I usually find it a hard concept to convey to my fellow local USsians.

replies(2): >>43931775 #>>43933307 #
macspoofing ◴[] No.43931775[source]
>to my fellow local USsians.

I think you illustrated why the concept exists. USA actually has "America" in its name, unlike others - hence 'Americans' and not 'USsians'.

replies(5): >>43932269 #>>43932642 #>>43932644 #>>43934703 #>>43936082 #
1. zimmund ◴[] No.43932269[source]
Well, in that case could we call them Statians or Unitians?
replies(1): >>43932345 #
2. jer0me ◴[] No.43932345[source]
Or perhaps Usonians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usonia
replies(1): >>43943786 #
3. xeonmc ◴[] No.43943786[source]
Muricans.