←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
nathell ◴[] No.43928925[source]
From [0]:

> Rev. Robert Prevost bears responsibility for allowing former Providence Catholic H.S. President and priest Richard McGrath to stay at the high school amidst sex abuse allegations that dated back to the 1990s.

> That's according to Eduardo Lopez de Casas, a clergy abuse survivor and national vice president of the Chicago-based Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP).

[0]: https://willcountygazette.com/stories/671124585-if-he-saw-an...

replies(5): >>43928967 #>>43929081 #>>43929083 #>>43929146 #>>43933681 #
BJones12 ◴[] No.43929083[source]
Seeing as he's now head of a religion that believes none of us is perfect (Romans 3:23) it's unsurprising to think someone may allege that he is not perfect.
replies(2): >>43929116 #>>43933099 #
eldaisfish ◴[] No.43929116[source]
bad faith response.

No one, from any religion, should directly or indirectly support crimes against minors. If people really cared about kids, we would protect them from sexual abuse from priests and prosecute priests via the legal system.

replies(1): >>43929308 #
BJones12 ◴[] No.43929308[source]
> If people really cared about kids, we would... prosecute priests via the legal system.

Prevost has literally said to alleged victims that they should go to the police.

replies(1): >>43929393 #
Capricorn2481 ◴[] No.43929393[source]
So he "literally" said he won't do anything about it until children can muster the courage and resources to prove in court they were abused.

This is "why didn't she go to the police" for children. The police are not to be trusted, certainly not to against the Catholic Church.

replies(1): >>43929470 #
anon291 ◴[] No.43929470[source]
Then who should investigate? The church cannot do anything to anyone they investigate other than 'order' them to remain in a monastery (which, they can leave at anytime since this is a free country and church rules are not law).
replies(4): >>43929543 #>>43929642 #>>43929712 #>>43929812 #
BJones12[dead post] ◴[] No.43929543[source]
[flagged]
hirvi74[dead post] ◴[] No.43930203[source]
[flagged]
1. BJones12 ◴[] No.43930364[source]
That's the thing...you would not be fortunate. The institution exists because it is a net benefit to humanity.

> Is there a single entity to have ever existed in the history of humanity that has more blood on its hands?

Depending on how you count, probably many. In wars, more than 98% of casualties are attributable to political wars that had no religious motivation, and fewer so of Roman Catholic motivation. So, whatever those political entities are.

A confounding factor in answering the question is that the Catholics have been around for 2000 years, and many violently bloody entities fell after comparably short periods of time. For example, the Khmer Rouge existed for 4 years and killed 3 million people, no religious entity could attain the same level of bloodshed over their long existence even if they tried, which they don't.