←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
vFunct ◴[] No.43929103[source]
The whole Catholic aesthetic is amazing. Really is the tops.
replies(8): >>43929283 #>>43929298 #>>43929398 #>>43929426 #>>43929513 #>>43929636 #>>43929680 #>>43930561 #
initramfs ◴[] No.43929398[source]
religions aren't an aesthetic. they're more than that.
replies(1): >>43929727 #
1. initramfs ◴[] No.43929727[source]
funny how one downvotes a comment whenever it sounds contrary to the presumed aesthetic.
replies(1): >>43930092 #
2. pc86 ◴[] No.43930092[source]
Commenting on votes is boring (and violates guidelines) but you probably got downvoted because they're talking about "the Catholic aesthetic" which is 100% a thing, and you started responding to "Catholicism is an aesthetic" which is a statement nobody said.
replies(1): >>43930259 #
3. initramfs ◴[] No.43930259[source]
I did not state Catholicism is an aesthetic. I replied to vFunct's comment "vFunct The whole Catholic aesthetic is amazing. Really is the tops." "with religion is more than an aesthetic." An aesthetic is using symbols and atmosphere, architecture, to create a beauty. A religion may use these objects, but also has values that do not depend on them.

Also, another person posted: " echelon "It truly is. As is the Ancient Roman aesthetic. There's a reason why Final Fantasy, Game of Thrones, Lord of the Rings, and many more fantasy series lean heavily into the look and feel."

So people suggesting video games and tv shows, even with lots of violence (particularly GoT) is an "aesthetic", is a lot more shallow than my basic point that religions aren't primarily aesthetic. Maybe you replied to the wrong comment.

replies(1): >>43930540 #
4. pc86 ◴[] No.43930540{3}[source]
"The Catholic aesthetic" refers to the aesthetic aspects of Catholicism.

"Religion is more than an aesthetic" is 100% true but nothing in the vFunct's statement suggests or implies anything to the contrary. So you're replying to something nobody said.