←back to thread

Design for 3D-Printing

(blog.rahix.de)
837 points q3k | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
darkteflon ◴[] No.43890650[source]
This looks so good. I’ve gotten into 3D printing in the past six months with an A1 Mini. I initially bought it intending solely to do creative projects with my kid, but I’ve been surprised to find myself getting deeper into printing functional parts. I recently printed a 6” server rack for a GLi.net Beryl and Apple TV for travel, from a combination of pre-designed and self-designed parts.

3D printing as a pursuit can be time-consuming - there’s always a risk with these things that you take them on as a dilettante and they end up gathering dust in a corner. I initially scraped by with some middling Blender skills (leaning into non-destructive operations where possible), but that is far from ideal - you really do need CAD. But to anyone considering jumping in, I would say: if you get an A1 (get the full size, not the Mini) and use Claude to write your parametric OpenSCAD scripts, the time commitment is such that you can _just about_ indulge in this hobby as a dilettante - eg, as a project for your kids. Without LLMs, I think it would be too much of a commitment unless you’re really dedicated, or already have CAD skills.

Anyway, gonna go read this in full.

replies(3): >>43890713 #>>43890796 #>>43890859 #
causality0 ◴[] No.43890796[source]
If you can assemble Legos you can design in Tinkercad. You don't need to mess around trying to get LLMs to write scad files, though the results can be hilarious.
replies(2): >>43890961 #>>43921582 #
darkteflon ◴[] No.43921582[source]
Tinkercad seems pretty popular, I definitely looked at it along the way, but ultimately I’m never going to choose to use a product from Autodesk if there’s any reasonable alternative, and I’m usually not going to choose something that’s not open source - especially for a hobby. Different strokes though, might be a good fit for some people.
replies(1): >>43926734 #
1. causality0 ◴[] No.43926734[source]
Huh? Claude isn't open-source and neither is Bambu.
replies(1): >>43935745 #
2. darkteflon ◴[] No.43935745[source]
No, but those pieces don’t have a learning curve, and I can swap them out easily (Bambu Studio is a fork of Prusa Slicer). If I spend the time learning Tinkercad, then Autodesk enshittifies it, I’ve got to re-skill in another CAD program, don’t I.

And starting your comments with “Huh?” is rude.