←back to thread

56 points PaulHoule | 5 comments | | HN request time: 2.159s | source
Show context
kaonwarb ◴[] No.43912022[source]
Impressive... and more research needed:

> About 40% of the tardigrades survived the procedure

Still impressive!

replies(2): >>43912483 #>>43913689 #
protocolture ◴[] No.43913689[source]
"New Laser kills 60% of Tardigrades" wasn't as snappy for the paper headline.
replies(1): >>43913986 #
snvzz ◴[] No.43913986[source]
Tardigrades are quite durable otherwise.
replies(2): >>43916321 #>>43921492 #
1. dekhn ◴[] No.43916321[source]
only in their dried-out state. Under regular conditions, they are easily squished.
replies(1): >>43919995 #
2. stavros ◴[] No.43919995[source]
OK, how? All the photos I've seen of them are taken with SEMs, implying that you can't squish them any more than you can squish an amoeba.
replies(1): >>43920747 #
3. dekhn ◴[] No.43920747[source]
I work with live tardigrades under a microscope and you could easily squish them with a little metal pick, or by pressing on the glass coverslip.

Tardigrades are very different from amoeba. They have a well-defined cuticle exoskeleton surrounding a liquid space, about 1000 cells, while an amoeba is single cell and highly deformable.

replies(1): >>43920757 #
4. stavros ◴[] No.43920757{3}[source]
Ahh, I thought you meant with your fingers or something, that makes sense.
replies(1): >>43921203 #
5. dekhn ◴[] No.43921203{4}[source]
I suspect if you really tried to deposit a pile of tardigrades on your finger and squeezed really tight you could probably damage them with the ridges of your fingerprints. I don't know enough about the biophysics of finger pressure and how the surfaces interact, and I wouldn't really want to do this (feels cruel, even if they have very limited nervous systems).