←back to thread

611 points LorenDB | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
writebetterc ◴[] No.43908008[source]
Yes, Rust is better. Implicit numeric conversion is terrible. However, don't use atoi if you're writing C++ :-). The STL has conversion functions that will throw, so separate problem.
replies(3): >>43908176 #>>43910253 #>>43910408 #
titzer ◴[] No.43908176[source]
> Implicit numeric conversion is terrible.

It's bad if it alters values (e.g. rounding). Promotion from one number representation to another (as long as it preserves values) isn't bad. This is trickier than it might seem, but Virgil has a good take on this (https://github.com/titzer/virgil/blob/master/doc/tutorial/Nu...). Essentially, it only implicitly promotes values in ways that don't lose numeric information and thus are always reversible.

In the example, Virgil won't let you pass "1000.00" to an integer argument, but will let you pass "100" to the double argument.

replies(3): >>43908281 #>>43911977 #>>43913226 #
1. dzaima ◴[] No.43911977[source]
Even that is somewhat bad, e.g. it means you miss "some_u64 = some_u32 * 8" losing bits due to promoting after the arith op, not before.