←back to thread

Matt Godbolt sold me on Rust by showing me C++

(www.collabora.com)
611 points LorenDB | 1 comments | 06 May 25 17:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.217s | source
Show context
markus_zhang ◴[06 May 25 18:09 UTC] No.43908006[source]▶
What if we have a C that removes the quirks without adding too much brain drain?

So no implicit type conversions, safer strings, etc.

replies(10): >>43908024 #>>43908037 #>>43908071 #>>43908130 #>>43908141 #>>43908193 #>>43908341 #>>43908840 #>>43909556 #>>43913099 #
1. cogman10 ◴[06 May 25 18:24 UTC] No.43908130[source]▶
I've seen this concept tried a few times (For example, MS tried it with Managed C++). The inevitable problem you run into is any such language isn't C++. Because of that, you end up needing to ask, "why pick this unpopular half C/C++ implementation and not Rust/go/D/Java/python/common lisp/haskell."

A big hard to solve problem is you are likely using a C because of the ecosystem and/or the performance characteristics. Because of the C header/macro situation that becomes just a huge headache. All the sudden you can't bring in, say, boost because the header uses the quirks excluded from your smaller C language.