←back to thread

1122 points felixrieseberg | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.435s | source
Show context
mrandish ◴[] No.43907199[source]
Great idea! I've been humorously referring to chat agents as next gen Clippy because of their chipper, talky default personas which I find insufferably annoying.

I'm kind of shocked Microsoft didn't already do this as an alt version of their CoPilot UI. Really a huge miss on their part because I hate the overbearingly intrusive way they keep forcing it into their OS, apps and my fucking laptop keyboard. If they at least acknowledged their behavior and owned it (with a sly wink), I'd hate it a little less. I might even be up for a "Clippy is my CoPilot" sticker on my laptop (calling back to the old 80s "Jesus is my Copilot" bumper stickers).

replies(15): >>43907398 #>>43907479 #>>43907590 #>>43907729 #>>43907921 #>>43908440 #>>43908923 #>>43909342 #>>43909871 #>>43911077 #>>43911198 #>>43912701 #>>43913063 #>>43914350 #>>43916787 #
1. teaearlgraycold ◴[] No.43907590[source]
Customers I build AI chat features for also liken it to clippy. I think it’s a very common association.
replies(1): >>43907945 #
2. dylan604 ◴[] No.43907945[source]
I hope you accept that likening how it is intended, and I can't imagine that being a good thing. Clippy was universally panned. To me, I wouldn't be telling people that the thing I'm spending time working on was received as this generation's Clippy.
replies(2): >>43909259 #>>43911140 #
3. Levitz ◴[] No.43909259[source]
Clippy was panned because it was intrusive and offered very little real help, but the design and concept themselves were always popular.
replies(1): >>43909728 #
4. dylan604 ◴[] No.43909728{3}[source]
you just described modern LLM bots as well
5. teaearlgraycold ◴[] No.43911140[source]
When talking with them I was surprised because they seemed to be invoking his name positively.