←back to thread

I just want to code (2023)

(www.zachbellay.com)
288 points SCUSKU | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
IvanK_net ◴[] No.43817875[source]
I have no idea why they mention coding. It is the same in any kind of job. You can bake cakes for fun, make music for fun, write poems, novels, play chess for fun, practice sports, grow potatos ...

At a certain stage, you realize that in order to be able to do only that job, you must make someone pay you for it. You must do it in a way (or in a volume) which makes others happy. The fact that it makes you happy is not enough anymore.

I don't think there is an angel and a devil. It is still the same thing. If you like the result of your work, there is a high chance that others will like it. You don't need to change what you do by a 100%. Changing it by 5% - 10% is often enough.

replies(4): >>43818020 #>>43819061 #>>43819501 #>>43820097 #
blahgeek ◴[] No.43818020[source]
I think it's more common because one doing only coding can get paid reasonably. On the contrary, few people who "bake cakes for fun, make music for fun, write poems, novels, play chess for fun, practice sports, grow potatos" can get paid enough for a living, so that's usually not an option to consider. (Which is the reason that I find us coding people very lucky.)
replies(3): >>43818457 #>>43822746 #>>43829729 #
goodpoint ◴[] No.43822746[source]
so you are saying work is meant to be miserable and coding is the exception. Is that a life worth living?
replies(1): >>43825169 #
1. xboxnolifes ◴[] No.43825169{3}[source]
It's not that work is meant to be miserable, it's that if work wasn't in some ways miserable/frustrating/unrewarding/etc, more people would be doing it for free.

Or rather, you wouldn't need to pay people to do things they already enjoy doing. So, the things you need to pay people to do must contain some things that people don't want to do for free.