←back to thread

I just want to code (2023)

(www.zachbellay.com)
288 points SCUSKU | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
alkonaut ◴[] No.43818348[source]
Do many people hobby code with that entrepreneur mindset thing? Or sit down to play guitar thinking they want to make a hit and feeling bad if they just noodle some cover songs? What a miserable existence that must be. How do you get that way? Should we blame LinkedIn or what is it?
replies(14): >>43818401 #>>43818404 #>>43818413 #>>43818559 #>>43818913 #>>43819720 #>>43819740 #>>43819901 #>>43819943 #>>43820066 #>>43820338 #>>43820790 #>>43823327 #>>43823734 #
Arisaka1 ◴[] No.43818913[source]
I will preface this by saying that, I decided to stop pursuing a job as a software developer because my 2 years of work experience mean nothing in the job market.

Now that I ended up finding a job as a waiter (of all things) I finally enjoy learning new things again. Before, I would get chronically stressed researching the job market, gathering keywords from job openings, consuming Udemy courses at 2x speed, using AI to plan the project and scaffold it. I was writing projects to save my life, because my finances are just that bad.

Surrendering and giving up the pursuit of work made all this mental load go away, and ironically made me progress in a personal skill level faster than anything else. I can now learn deeply. I can tinker with code to my heart's content. I can see all the warnings. I can research why this and that happen, without feeling like I have to "sigma grindset" every second.

Perhaps when the storm is gone with the whole "AI is gonna take our jobs" and the market demanding every keyword match, and I feel more confident in myself I'll try to get professional again. Or not. All I know is that I love programming.

replies(4): >>43819140 #>>43820105 #>>43822469 #>>43823642 #
nottorp ◴[] No.43820105{3}[source]
Related: Historically, most "universal men" that greatly advanced science before the last 1-2 centuries were independently wealthy.
replies(1): >>43820779 #
1. PhilipRoman ◴[] No.43820779{4}[source]
This also depends heavily on the field, some sciences need particle accelerators and mass spectrometers, meanwhile we can get by on a $200 pc and free wifi. This means you can bypass a lot of traditional university/lab structures.
replies(1): >>43829301 #
2. nottorp ◴[] No.43829301[source]
The point is not that they could afford expensive tools.

The point is that they did their research sort of "for fun".