←back to thread

254 points perihelions | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.345s | source
Show context
47282847 ◴[] No.43810954[source]
It’s interesting to muse about the larger picture here. What is it that makes autism so dangerous? To me it looks like part of an almost spiritual war against empathy/compassion by traumatized individuals trying to fight their own Jungian Shadow.
replies(17): >>43810993 #>>43811031 #>>43811124 #>>43811131 #>>43811210 #>>43811523 #>>43811563 #>>43812343 #>>43813804 #>>43816351 #>>43816599 #>>43816739 #>>43816746 #>>43817086 #>>43818486 #>>43825472 #>>43866752 #
rayiner ◴[] No.43816351[source]
Fixing diseases and abnormalities in humans is empathy and compassion.
replies(4): >>43816529 #>>43817406 #>>43817454 #>>43825922 #
MattGrommes ◴[] No.43817406[source]
The problem is not fixing diseases. The problem is what is defined as a disease or abnormality. The problem is people who are clearly choosing abnormalities based on politics, power grabs, and anti-science rhetoric.
replies(1): >>43817685 #
rayiner ◴[] No.43817685[source]
Science and medicine is what has defined autism as a disease or abnormality. Science and medicine are telling us that the rates of these diseases are growing dramatically, for decades now.

RFK isn’t the one who made autism concern happen. My three year old’s teacher asked us to get him tested with the county for autism. It’s a very common thing parents are dealing with these days. I’d argue that what you’re saying is exactly backward. The medical community has defined a lot of normal behavior as autism.

Now, I agree RFK’s views on what’s causing autism are anti-scientific, and I doubt he’ll be able to figure out what’s causing it. But RFK has a platform because the medical community has diagnosed all these kids as autistic but doesn’t have an explanation for what’s causing it. So looks like RFK fill the void.

replies(3): >>43818125 #>>43818598 #>>43822045 #
1. ActorNightly ◴[] No.43818125[source]
>Science and medicine is what has defined autism as a disease or abnormality.

Not really. DSM is not really scientific, its more statistical.

You could make arguments that autism is actually evolutionary, as people who are on the spectrum in certain ways are often better in select areas than neuro typical people.