←back to thread

BART's Anime Mascots

(www.bart.gov)
150 points archagon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
godelski ◴[] No.43807867[source]
I do like the idea of mascots, but truthfully I think they are better done as non-human mascots and need to be simple. I think Japan got this right with Yura-chara[0]. There seems to be a strong preference for non-human characters and when there are human ones, they're still overly simplistic.

Seems like same rule about flags[1]: a child should be able to draw it from memory.

Only Barty seems to fit these conditions.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuru-chara

[1] https://nava.org/good-flag-bad-flag

replies(7): >>43807950 #>>43808256 #>>43808401 #>>43808480 #>>43808518 #>>43808826 #>>43811116 #
j4coh ◴[] No.43811116[source]
I always thought this “a child should be able to draw it” thing was an even better example of a vaguely contrarian factoid that sort of makes you sound smart if you don’t think about it too much, so it becomes endlessly repeated. Which is an interesting phenomenon in its own way.
replies(2): >>43812120 #>>43813348 #
deeThrow94 ◴[] No.43812120[source]
It's not a fact(oid) at all as it's not a statement about reality. it's a principle. You don't have to agree with it, but others might disagree about the quality of the flag you might produce avoiding it.
replies(1): >>43813096 #
j4coh ◴[] No.43813096[source]
Sure but I’m more talking about the way people use it than what it is in reality. Obviously it’s not a real truism, but if you heard it once then it’s something vaguely smart sounding you can say whenever a topic about flags comes up, even when it’s essentially a non-sequitur as in this case. People find it nearly irresistible to mention, which is fascinating.
replies(2): >>43814898 #>>43820038 #
godelski ◴[] No.43814898[source]
Real world constraints mean any well constructed principle must at times be violated. That's not a flaw in the principle. A good principle for principles ("rules" in varying uses of the word) is that they need to be simple. Rules/principles of any kind are guides not immutable policies. It would be insane to create immutable policies as the world is constantly changing.

If a rule is overly complex, no one can remember it and there can be no expectation for people to follow.

tldr: All rules are guides. Be they rules rules or "rules" rules

replies(1): >>43818097 #
1. j4coh ◴[] No.43818097[source]
Yes makes sense, I’m more talking about the way people use it in casual conversations than what it is in reality. Obviously it’s not a real “rule” with anyone enforcing it, flags children can draw aren’t actually generally inherently better in any non-subjective sense, and reality is a complex place.