←back to thread

I just want to code (2023)

(www.zachbellay.com)
288 points SCUSKU | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.082s | source
Show context
androng ◴[] No.43815894[source]
>No one likes schleps, but hackers especially dislike them. Most hackers who start startups wish they could do it by just writing some clever software, putting it on a server somewhere, and watching the money roll in—without ever having to talk to users, or negotiate with other companies, or deal with other people's broken code. Maybe that's possible, but I haven't seen it.

>One of the many things we do at Y Combinator is teach hackers about the inevitability of schleps. No, you can't start a startup by just writing code. I remember going through this realization myself. There was a point in 1995 when I was still trying to convince myself I could start a company by just writing code. But I soon learned from experience that schleps are not merely inevitable, but pretty much what business consists of. A company is defined by the schleps it will undertake.

>The most striking example I know of schlep blindness is Stripe, or rather Stripe's idea. For over a decade, every hacker who'd ever had to process payments online knew how painful the experience was.

https://www.paulgraham.com/schlep.html

replies(3): >>43816013 #>>43816127 #>>43817194 #
Macha ◴[] No.43816013[source]
A lot of why people didn't build Stripe before was that to enter the payments space you needed connections to get the banks and payment processors to work with you. In comparison, you don't need anyone's permission to make uber for dry cleaners or something in line with other trends of the time. I doubt the Collison brothers would have been as successful getting Stripe off the ground if it had been their first company.
replies(2): >>43816308 #>>43817411 #
coolThingsFirst ◴[] No.43816308[source]
Anything thats remotely disruptive requires the same deep connections.

Tech just doesnt have many opportunities left.

replies(5): >>43816362 #>>43816625 #>>43816821 #>>43817297 #>>43817332 #
1. morkalork ◴[] No.43816362[source]
Working at a start-up now and seeing how many partnerships are solely due to connections of the CEO or a random board member is crushing. The tech side is an entirely and relatively easily solvable problem in comparison to the rest.
replies(2): >>43816695 #>>43823388 #
2. mlinhares ◴[] No.43816695[source]
Has always been, there are a few cases where this wasn't true but odds are any industry you want to "enter" needs someone with connections to open the doors for you.

Tech is a problem that needs solving but it isn't the biggest problem to be solved, having a network and knowing people is more than half the job.

replies(1): >>43816918 #
3. HeyLaughingBoy ◴[] No.43823388[source]
And?

Those connections didn't materialize out of thin air, you know. Your CEO/random board member had to meet people, understand what they do, keep those connections alive, etc.

Why can't you do the same? Start now and in five years you'll be a lot more connected than you are at this moment. This is also an entirely solvable problem.