←back to thread

20 points praveeninpublic | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source

While browsing YouTube, an AI-generated video appeared and I reflexively told my wife, “That’s AI—skip it.”

Yet I’m using AI-created illustrations for my graphic novel, fully aware of copyright and legal debates.

Both Copilots and art generators are trained on vast datasets—so why do we cheer one and vilify the other?

We lean on ChatGPT to rewrite blog posts and celebrate Copilot for “boosting productivity,” but AI art still raises eyebrows.

Is this a matter of domain familiarity, perceived craftsmanship, or simple cultural gatekeeping?

1. leeeeeepw ◴[] No.43815651[source]
Idk I like art generators ... I made ra1 art generator, pretty popula, it indexes lots of other art generators and basically uses the right one for each query