←back to thread

BART's Anime Mascots

(www.bart.gov)
150 points archagon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
godelski ◴[] No.43807867[source]
I do like the idea of mascots, but truthfully I think they are better done as non-human mascots and need to be simple. I think Japan got this right with Yura-chara[0]. There seems to be a strong preference for non-human characters and when there are human ones, they're still overly simplistic.

Seems like same rule about flags[1]: a child should be able to draw it from memory.

Only Barty seems to fit these conditions.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuru-chara

[1] https://nava.org/good-flag-bad-flag

replies(7): >>43807950 #>>43808256 #>>43808401 #>>43808480 #>>43808518 #>>43808826 #>>43811116 #
j4coh ◴[] No.43811116[source]
I always thought this “a child should be able to draw it” thing was an even better example of a vaguely contrarian factoid that sort of makes you sound smart if you don’t think about it too much, so it becomes endlessly repeated. Which is an interesting phenomenon in its own way.
replies(2): >>43812120 #>>43813348 #
1. numpad0 ◴[] No.43813348[source]
Interesting point. Can anyone here draw a geometrically, not semantically, accurate Apple logo, without references? I can't, a reasonably convincing humanoid heads are much easier than that.