←back to thread

254 points perihelions | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
0x1ceb00da ◴[] No.43811069[source]
One thing this will do is disincentivize high functioning autists from identifying themselves as autists, which is a very good thing IMO. Just look at this channel https://www.youtube.com/@NationalAutisticSoc/videos. There is a lot of survivor-ship bias on this channel towards high functioning autists who can talk in front of a camera.

Just to give an idea to those not familiar with the difference between high functioning and low functioning autism, high functioning autists face problems like not being able to communicate properly some of the time, and low functioning autists face problems like not even being able to tell their caretaker which part of their body is in pain, or which kid in the group punched them.

Edit: The National Autistic Society is UK based but the situation is not that different in other countries.

replies(12): >>43811100 #>>43811139 #>>43811161 #>>43811169 #>>43811230 #>>43811250 #>>43811315 #>>43811319 #>>43811388 #>>43812008 #>>43812663 #>>43817278 #
autoexec ◴[] No.43811100[source]
activities that would result in "identifying themselves as autists" include: seeking a diagnosis in the first place, getting the help of a mental health professional, frequenting support groups and forums, and wearing a fitbit or smart watch.

It's really not a good thing when people, high functioning or not, are forced to choose between getting the help they need and being targeted by their government.

replies(1): >>43811140 #
1. jdrek1 ◴[] No.43811140[source]
> and wearing a fitbit or smart watch.

Since when is wearing smart watches only for autists?

replies(1): >>43811286 #
2. autoexec ◴[] No.43811286[source]
It's one of the many private data sources they were planning to use to track and collect data on autistic people for their database. https://people.com/rfk-jr-to-launch-autism-registry-using-pr...

Autistic or not, giving that kind of health information to private for-profit companies who collect that data to use it against you or sell to third parties was never a good idea even before the government wanted to take it for themselves.

replies(1): >>43812350 #
3. jdrek1 ◴[] No.43812350[source]
Ah, I didn't know that. To me your sentence read like autists out themselves by wearing a smartwatch.

Fully agree with you on that, the less data they have, the better.