←back to thread

254 points perihelions | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
formerly_proven ◴[] No.43810612[source]
The criteria for diagnosing ASD today are vastly different from those that would’ve resulted in an autism diagnosis shortly after the abolishment of lobotomy, it is hardly surprising the rate keeps going up as you widen the net.
replies(6): >>43810638 #>>43810664 #>>43810739 #>>43810771 #>>43810806 #>>43811002 #
mschuster91 ◴[] No.43810771[source]
> The criteria for diagnosing ASD today are vastly different

Not that much.

The difference between now and 50 years ago is that a) we don't just throw them into asylums, b) we actually have accessibility of getting diagnosed, c) employment opportunities suitable for many people with mental disabilities (such as factory line assembly) have gone down the drain.

replies(2): >>43810900 #>>43810986 #
AlecSchueler ◴[] No.43810900[source]
None of those points are related to diagnostic criteria.
replies(1): >>43811052 #
crote ◴[] No.43811052[source]
No, they are related to the pool of people being diagnosed.

You're only getting a diagnosis if a) you have access to a psychiatrist and b) you are running into enough issues in your daily life to warrant having it looked into.

Life has gotten a lot more complex over the past few decades, so people run into issues more often - and earlier in life. Someone who would've just been "a bit of a weird guy" 50 years ago is getting an autism diagnosis today, simply because these days they run into issues as a child and are being put in front of a psychiatrist.

replies(1): >>43811086 #
1. dns_snek ◴[] No.43811086[source]
Even 50 years ago they weren't just slightly odd people who were otherwise happy to exist in a simpler society. Those people ran into the same issues and turned to alcohol, drugs, and suicide. The only difference is that nobody understood why they were suffering.