←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
923 points coloneltcb | 3 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.917s | source
Show context
peakskill ◴[26 Apr 25 16:44 UTC] No.43805131[source]▶
Wikipedia IS ideologically captured and a propaganda target. This is not up for debate.

What it needs now is a bipartisan, sybil resistant algorithm like X’s community notes’ in order to accept/reject edits.

replies(2): >>43805765 #>>43805776 #
1. munchler ◴[26 Apr 25 18:02 UTC] No.43805765[source]▶
> Wikipedia IS ideologically captured and a propaganda target. This is not up for debate.

What an absurd claim to make without any evidence. Citation needed.

replies(2): >>43808721 #>>43817073 #
2. yew ◴[27 Apr 25 01:25 UTC] No.43808721[source]▶
Evidence is socially constructed. It's the view of the public that neckbeards and debate-bros should be expunged. This isn't a debate.
3. peakskill ◴[28 Apr 25 02:54 UTC] No.43817073[source]▶
Lived experience. I am the source, lib. Why would you be against a bipartisan curation algorithm like the one employed by community notes if you didn’t subconsciously agree with me?