←back to thread

848 points coloneltcb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.197s | source
Show context
IceHegel ◴[] No.43801412[source]
Curtis Yarvin has a riff that goes something like this: Liberal Wikipedia, Communist Wikipedia, and Fascist Wikipedia will all actually agree on the vast majority of topics: Physics, botany, the solar system, chemistry, math, statistics etc.

However they'll be worlds apart on history, economics, anthropology, sexuality, politics, previous leaders and so on.

Our Wikipedia is the world seen through the eyes of the New York Times + Harvard. Our Wikipedia is probably correct about Physics, botany...

replies(2): >>43802121 #>>43805688 #
1. unethical_ban ◴[] No.43805688[source]
Ah yes, the anti-democracy comp sci guy that is inspiring some of the more powerful people in Washington.