←back to thread

1371 points kwindla | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.632s | source
Show context
torginus ◴[] No.43801939[source]
I have said this and will reiterate - building an 'afforable' EV is impossible with the current level of technology - by which I mean a vehicle that competes on price with affordable ICE vehicles, and doesn't make compromises that would make it impractical to own as the only car.

There are $20k cars with infotainment, bodypaint and probably a lot more creature comforts than this thing. Also this thing has a 150 mile range (less probably IRL), which is not practical.

Looking at the basic shape, the drag looks horrible, and probably the efficiencys bad too, considering they only manage 150k with an 52kWh battery.

Euros have already tried this, they put out abominable shitboxes where they tried to save money everywhere but the battery and charger, and the result were poverty cars which barely cost less than a Model 3.

Once you spend the money on a 400 mile battery and a fast enough charger to be practical, you're most of the way in terms of BOM to a 300HP electric upmarket road monster. Tesla understood this, and are dominating the market.

BYD also knows this, and there's a reason their C-segment EVs cost more than their D-segment plug-ins, despite the latter having tons of electric range.

Also doesn't cost $20k from the factory, it costs $20k with tax credit.

replies(1): >>43805423 #
1. gniv ◴[] No.43805423[source]
Why is this? We've been told that the cost of batteries is in freefall for years now. Why aren't they competitive yet with ICE, even if they are heavier?
replies(1): >>43808236 #
2. mixmastamyk ◴[] No.43808236[source]
It’s a process happening over time. Why the grandparent’s comment will age horribly in only five years.

I remember similar comments about digital cameras shortly after Y2k. A dozen years later it was already hard to use anything else.

Read the innovator’s dilemma for a full understanding of the process.