←back to thread

923 points coloneltcb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
sedev ◴[] No.43800538[source]
I am going to say a thing I say a lot: please edit Wikipedia. It is easier to do than you probably think! Wikipedia's biggest constraint is no longer money or server space, it's editor time (especially since LLM-based garbage is a force multiplier on disruptive editing that does not have a corresponding improvement to good-faith editing). Any topic area you know about and/or care about can benefit from your attention. Fixing typos is valuable. Adding photos is valuable. Flagging vandalism is valuable. Please edit Wikipedia.
replies(33): >>43800548 #>>43800561 #>>43800562 #>>43800627 #>>43800656 #>>43800869 #>>43800924 #>>43800973 #>>43801067 #>>43801176 #>>43801349 #>>43801481 #>>43801492 #>>43801580 #>>43801831 #>>43801854 #>>43801895 #>>43801972 #>>43801986 #>>43802252 #>>43802417 #>>43803156 #>>43804597 #>>43806169 #>>43806198 #>>43806256 #>>43806358 #>>43806607 #>>43806723 #>>43807364 #>>43807423 #>>43811812 #>>43822115 #
qingcharles ◴[] No.43801481[source]
I've been an editor since 2004. It's getting really, really hard now. Like, it is really off-putting and no longer enjoyable.
replies(2): >>43801882 #>>43804286 #
1. joenot443 ◴[] No.43804286[source]
21 years of editing, that's awesome! I'm curious though, what's changed? If I were to maybe guess, I'd imagine it coincides with the rising temperature of the online culture war?
replies(1): >>43809458 #
2. qingcharles ◴[] No.43809458[source]
You tend to have to get all your ducks 100% in a row before you edit or create. It used to be I could author a new article with some decent solid sources and there would be no argument. Then someone later would come and fix any deficiencies and maybe switch out the sources for better ones.

Basically, it's become "perfect is the enemy of good."