←back to thread

395 points url | 3 comments | | HN request time: 2.786s | source
Show context
casey2[dead post] ◴[] No.43800347[source]
[flagged]
top1bobby[dead post] ◴[] No.43800947[source]
[flagged]
1. necovek ◴[] No.43804265[source]
I though I had a decent command of English language, even if I am not a native speaker, but I have no ide what is "naive structuralism" or "overwrought reductionism" in this context.

Would any of you care to elaborate? I am serious, I am not familiar much with the UK political scene so can't tie these normal sounding phrases to anything, and would honestly appreciate some help.

replies(1): >>43805923 #
2. ear7h ◴[] No.43805923[source]
This sounds like an intellectual debate but there's nothing of substance being said here lol. casey2 thinks British people today are wrongly (naively) complaining about the rich/powerful/elite (structuralism). top1bobby is making fun of casey2 because the latter is using a lot of big words (overwrought) while _reducing_ complicated politics to a single issue; basically "you think you're smart with fancy words but you are just as bad as the people you complain about (P.S. I can use fancy words too)"
replies(1): >>43810165 #
3. necovek ◴[] No.43810165[source]
Thanks for the rundown, appreciated! :)