←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
851 points coloneltcb | 1 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.347s | source
Show context
firesteelrain[dead post] ◴[25 Apr 25 23:46 UTC] No.43799539[source]▶
[flagged]
blibble ◴[26 Apr 25 01:29 UTC] No.43800115[source]▶
or they could move to a country that respects the rule of law and continue operating as they do at present

may I suggest Switzerland

replies(1): >>43803465 #
1. firesteelrain ◴[26 Apr 25 13:30 UTC] No.43803465[source]▶
It’s not about that. It’s about tax avoidance. By saying they are 501c3, there are rules and laws they must follow or risk losing their 501c3 status. Now that they have been put on notice, it’s important for them to tighten up