←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
855 points coloneltcb | 3 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.612s | source
Show context
mjrpes ◴[25 Apr 25 23:54 UTC] No.43799593[source]▶
Here's the letter: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ocNyx34Et19sKtlta0bTPPzSPcp...

No claims, no evidence. No sources, except "it has come to my attention" and "information received by my office".

replies(5): >>43799650 #>>43799855 #>>43800768 #>>43801411 #>>43802931 #
1. pwarner ◴[26 Apr 25 12:16 UTC] No.43802931[source]▶
It was probably Elon
replies(1): >>43803405 #
2. 93po ◴[26 Apr 25 13:23 UTC] No.43803405[source]▶
Can we stop bringing up annoying people in every single comment section when they have nothing to do with the topic at hand?
replies(1): >>43805322 #
3. llm_nerd ◴[26 Apr 25 17:08 UTC] No.43805322[source]▶
Elon Musk has been waging a war with Wikipedia[1] for a couple of years now, and has the ear of the president. Of those in the administration, he is the single name that really stands out as a guy with a Wikipedia beef.

Seems like he has lots to do with the topic, and it is absolutely likely that he is the one who elicited this. Recall that Musk also basically appointed his own head of the IRS (though Bessent then ousted that person and installed his own stooge).

1 - https://www.the-independent.com/tech/elon-musk-wikipedia-naz...