←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
923 points coloneltcb | 3 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 1.92s | source
Show context
tzs ◴[26 Apr 25 00:00 UTC] No.43799641[source]▶
> Before being named U.S. attorney, Martin appeared on Russia-backed media networks more than 150 times, The Washington Post reported last week. In one appearance on RT in 2022, he said there was no evidence of military buildup on Ukraine’s boarders only nine days before Russia invaded the country. He further criticized U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia security concerns.

This is getting ridiculous. Is there anyone associated with this administration who does not have a record of promoting Russia's positions?

replies(5): >>43799655 #>>43799885 #>>43800099 #>>43800704 #>>43801144 #
r053bud ◴[26 Apr 25 00:43 UTC] No.43799885[source]▶
We voted for this! This is “democracy” at work
replies(10): >>43799926 #>>43800052 #>>43800056 #>>43800515 #>>43800646 #>>43801002 #>>43801436 #>>43801899 #>>43802403 #>>43802632 #
candiddevmike ◴[26 Apr 25 01:17 UTC] No.43800056[source]▶
Less than 30% of voter age Americans voted for this
replies(12): >>43800169 #>>43800250 #>>43800437 #>>43800509 #>>43800785 #>>43800793 #>>43800878 #>>43800929 #>>43801035 #>>43807875 #>>43807902 #>>43807979 #
rchaud ◴[26 Apr 25 02:38 UTC] No.43800437[source]▶
The majority that did vote, voted for this. The participation rate has always been low in rich western countries. Given the standards of media literacy and civics education, there's no evidence that a higher participation rate would have changed the outcome.
replies(13): >>43800449 #>>43800539 #>>43800545 #>>43800641 #>>43800701 #>>43800849 #>>43800913 #>>43801020 #>>43801047 #>>43801050 #>>43801122 #>>43801344 #>>43801390 #
1. pesus ◴[26 Apr 25 02:41 UTC] No.43800449[source]▶
Plurality, not majority. It may be pedantic but it's an important difference.
replies(2): >>43800527 #>>43807580 #
2. rafram ◴[26 Apr 25 03:01 UTC] No.43800527[source]▶
I was going to say that it was a majority this time, but it seems like the results shifted as more votes were counted after election night, and he ended up with 49.8%. Still, unbelievably, pretty close to a majority.
3. khazhoux ◴[26 Apr 25 21:58 UTC] No.43807580[source]▶
I don’t think it’s important in the slightest. Fact is that they were exactly two competitive candidates, and of all the people that cared to vote, more voted for one than the other. It may not be technical majority, but this is the common understanding in this country of “majority rule.”