←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
760 points coloneltcb | 5 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 1.345s | source
Show context
kurtreed2[dead post] ◴[25 Apr 25 23:53 UTC] No.43799586[source]▶
[flagged]
1. anigbrowl ◴[26 Apr 25 00:18 UTC] No.43799753[source]▶
A polemic! It must all be true.

Last revised by deleted account 1 month ago

Damn Wikipedia assassinating critics now? Where will it all end

replies(1): >>43799971 #
2. kurtreed2 ◴[26 Apr 25 00:57 UTC] No.43799971[source]▶
> Damn Wikipedia character assassinating critics now

FTFY. If you go dig deeper at foundation.wikimedia.org you'll inevitably come across an Israeli court document describing systemic smear defamation and libel campaign mounted by toxic editors against an academic, which lasted around a decade.

replies(1): >>43800042 #
3. anigbrowl ◴[26 Apr 25 01:12 UTC] No.43800042[source]▶
You're trying too hard, much like the writer of this polemic.
replies(2): >>43800522 #>>43800533 #
4. ◴[26 Apr 25 02:59 UTC] No.43800522{3}[source]▶
5. kurtreed2 ◴[26 Apr 25 03:02 UTC] No.43800533{3}[source]▶
You should make an account on Wikipediocracy (which is frequented by many Wikipedia editors and insiders) and express all your paeans about Wikipedia's supposed infallibility, and see how fast you'd get dressed-down.