Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)

Show context

tzs ◴[26 Apr 25 00:00 UTC] No.43799641[source]▶

> Before being named U.S. attorney, Martin appeared on Russia-backed media networks more than 150 times, The Washington Post reported last week. In one appearance on RT in 2022, he said there was no evidence of military buildup on Ukraine’s boarders only nine days before Russia invaded the country. He further criticized U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia security concerns.

This is getting ridiculous. Is there anyone associated with this administration who does not have a record of promoting Russia's positions?

replies(5): >>43799655 #>>43799885 #>>43800099 #>>43800704 #>>43801144 #

1. Fauntleroy ◴[26 Apr 25 00:02 UTC] No.43799655[source]▶

>>43799641 #

[flagged]

replies(4): >>43799770 #>>43799787 #>>43799946 #>>43800595 #

2. walrus01 ◴[26 Apr 25 00:21 UTC] No.43799770[source]▶

>>43799655 (TP) #

Well, considering they have a very high ranking guy in the Putin regime who considers that to be his full time job, google "Vladislav Surkov", they seem to be doing a fairly effective job of it so far.

replies(1): >>43799882 #

3. esseph ◴[26 Apr 25 00:24 UTC] No.43799787[source]▶

>>43799655 (TP) #

They'd be the exact same.

It's like like Dugin's Foundations of Geopolitics was a wish list.

4. hightrix ◴[26 Apr 25 00:43 UTC] No.43799882[source]▶

>>43799770 #

Russia has a pretty high ranking guy in the US Government as well, google Krasnov.

5. kylecazar ◴[26 Apr 25 00:52 UTC] No.43799946[source]▶

>>43799655 (TP) #

If they were any good at it there would probably be less overt Russian sympathizing.

replies(1): >>43799983 #