←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
760 points coloneltcb | 1 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
jmclnx ◴[25 Apr 25 23:08 UTC] No.43799332[source]▶
Well seems the war on truth has started. There is a 1984 quote about history that escapes me now.
replies(6): >>43799359 #>>43799397 #>>43799410 #>>43799551 #>>43799584 #>>43799659 #
Alupis[dead post] ◴[25 Apr 25 23:20 UTC] No.43799397[source]▶
[flagged]
cogogo ◴[25 Apr 25 23:42 UTC] No.43799502[source]▶
I actually clicked this link in good faith. Glad to see the downvote I can’t make arrived.
replies(1): >>43799647 #
1. hagbard_c ◴[26 Apr 25 00:01 UTC] No.43799647[source]▶
Why are you glad for a downvote? Just because you don't agree with Sanger's point of view does not make it less worthwhile to read about it. Censorship is not something to be glad about and yes, downvoting opinions outside of your desired narrative until they are greyed out into oblivion or killed is a form of censorship.