←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
760 points coloneltcb | 2 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 1.338s | source
Show context
mikeyouse ◴[25 Apr 25 23:34 UTC] No.43799467[source]▶
Remember when people pretended it was the scandal of all scandals that the IRS was reviewing PACs who were forbidden from doing political activity for political activity? And now many of those same people are cheering this, and the act blue ‘investigation’, and the threats against Harvard’s tax exempt status for nakedly corrupt reasons? Man I wish shame still had some stopping power.
replies(2): >>43799481 #>>43799553 #
nailer[dead post] ◴[25 Apr 25 23:36 UTC] No.43799481[source]▶
[flagged]
1. anigbrowl ◴[26 Apr 25 00:00 UTC] No.43799639[source]▶
I don't think those accusations need to be taken seriously while they're being hyped by people like Jim Jordan. If they have evidence of wrongdoing they should forward it to the DoJ and write it up in an indictment, where it can be reviewed by a court and jury that will evaluate the claims made therein.
replies(1): >>43804155 #
2. nailer ◴[26 Apr 25 14:51 UTC] No.43804155[source]▶
I have no idea who Jim Jordan is but your logical fallacy is nut picking.