←back to thread

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

(www.washingtonpost.com)
767 points coloneltcb | 1 comments | 25 Apr 25 23:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
jmclnx ◴[25 Apr 25 23:08 UTC] No.43799332[source]▶
Well seems the war on truth has started. There is a 1984 quote about history that escapes me now.
replies(6): >>43799359 #>>43799397 #>>43799410 #>>43799551 #>>43799584 #>>43799659 #
gwervc[dead post] ◴[25 Apr 25 23:52 UTC] No.43799584[source]▶
[flagged]
1. spamizbad ◴[25 Apr 25 23:55 UTC] No.43799597[source]▶
If you call something gender fluid you lose tax exempt status? Good to know.

I just feel that logically this doesn't make any sense. Having the view or even promoting the idea that a mythical creature is "gender fluid" isn't an overt political action. It doesn't help any political party or politician. There are numerous fully-compliant tax-exempt organizations that directly aid LGBTQIA+ individuals. How are these above board but having someone submit content to your organization that claims the Nure-onna might be genderfluid is crossing into the realm of politics by influencing election outcomes?