←back to thread

1329 points kwindla | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
taylodl ◴[] No.43794600[source]
I LOVE it! THIS is the kind of truck I'd be looking at to replace my 1998 Ford Ranger.

Here is what could be potential deal-breakers:

- Lack of a mobile app. Minimalist design is great, but I still want an app to manage charging and be alerted to any vehicle issues.

- Lack of good charge management and battery conditioning. Either that, or a cheap and easy to replace battery pack. I'd really like both!

- Comparable hauling and towing capacity to the 1998 Ford Ranger. Those numbers aren't exactly impressive, but I do use the truck as a truck, and I occasionally need the hauling capacity (weight).

- Bucket seats. I need a bench seat so I can take my wife and dog. Think weekend glamping trips. Picture 8 shows a bucket seat. It doesn't look like that would work.

If anyone from Slate is reading this, this is how I'm looking at this truck. FYI, I'll be comparing this to the Ford Maverick.

replies(31): >>43794692 #>>43794700 #>>43794763 #>>43794811 #>>43794831 #>>43794885 #>>43794914 #>>43794974 #>>43795270 #>>43795643 #>>43795656 #>>43795796 #>>43795943 #>>43796252 #>>43796714 #>>43796752 #>>43797342 #>>43797635 #>>43797641 #>>43797951 #>>43798033 #>>43798145 #>>43798246 #>>43798255 #>>43798738 #>>43799693 #>>43799714 #>>43799836 #>>43800852 #>>43801127 #>>43805436 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.43794811[source]
> - Lack of a mobile app. Minimalist design is great, but I still want an app to manage charging and be alerted to any vehicle issues.

Noooooooooo! No apps, please! Finally a car not tethered to and dependent on your phone, and we already have our first request to app-ify it!

EDIT: Ughhh, according to the video that another user posted, it looks like there's an app, and yes, "updates" go through it :(

> - Lack of good charge management and battery conditioning. Either that, or a cheap and easy to replace battery pack. I'd really like both!

Yes to a simple battery system!

> - Comparable hauling and towing capacity to the 1998 Ford Ranger. Those numbers aren't exactly impressive, but I do use the truck as a truck, and I occasionally need the hauling capacity (weight).

Yes!

> - Bucket seats. I need a bench seat so I can take my wife and dog. Think weekend glamping trips. Picture 8 shows a bucket seat. It doesn't look like that would work.

Yes, definitely. It being a 2 seater is kind of a deal breaker for families. You really want a bench seat to at least stick a small child between the driver and passenger. Back in the day, we'd stuff 3 kids between two adults, but these days the Safety People would have a heart attack just thinking about that.

The article mentions an SUV upgrade kit that will bolt onto the back of the truck. Ugh, OK I guess. Sad that that's the way it will probably have to go.

1: https://youtu.be/cq1qEjwSYkw

replies(10): >>43794873 #>>43795949 #>>43796259 #>>43796268 #>>43796857 #>>43797069 #>>43797219 #>>43798980 #>>43799459 #>>43802258 #
hylaride ◴[] No.43795949[source]
> Yes, definitely. It being a 2 seater is kind of a deal breaker for families.

What you need is not a pickup truck. Catering to families means expensive bells and whistles, like entertainment systems, etc.

> Back in the day, we'd stuff 3 kids between two adults, but these days the Safety People would have a heart attack just thinking about that.

Rightfully so. Back in the day we did so many things we shouldn't have, and survivorship bias makes us default to thinking it was ok. As kids, we used to go barrelling down dirt roads in the back of pickups or played in the backs of station wagons. There's a reason automobile deaths have gone down.

replies(4): >>43796002 #>>43796209 #>>43796374 #>>43796596 #
RandomBacon ◴[] No.43796002[source]
> Catering to families means expensive bells and whistles, like entertainment systems, etc.

It absolutely does NOT mean those things.

Cars didn't have entertainment systems for nearly a century and families did just fine.

<Get off my lawn>

My entertainment system was the window. Observe the world, not just whatever AI-generated garbage some algorithm pushes to a small screen 8-10 inches away from your eyes.

</Get off my lawn>

replies(9): >>43796116 #>>43796138 #>>43796139 #>>43796707 #>>43796847 #>>43796890 #>>43798607 #>>43798783 #>>43798974 #
ethbr1 ◴[] No.43796138[source]
And aside from a window, you know what's better than a car infotainment system?

A physical holder for a personal pad device.

The amount of not-invented-here, duplicate functionality that car companies execute poorly, when buyers already have devices that do that well, is ridiculous.

The biggest benefit of aligning manufacturing costs for profit should be jettisoning the "post-sale" revenue streams that drive complicated built-in tech for current cars.

And also, you-know, 100% A+ on getting back to "customize your own car, because it's cheap and supported"!

Owners being afraid of doing what they want with their devices/vehicles has to stop.

replies(2): >>43796845 #>>43797823 #
looofooo0 ◴[] No.43796845[source]
Lol, yes we just throw a phone and a Tablet with headphones to the kids.
replies(1): >>43797982 #
jajko[dead post] ◴[] No.43797982[source]
[flagged]
1. GuinansEyebrows ◴[] No.43799510{3}[source]
I'm sure your screenless children are perfect :)
replies(1): >>43799887 #
2. tomrod ◴[] No.43799887[source]
Aye. It's a staple of both failed and successful parents. In fact, using a screen in a car is wholly unrelated to, well, anything.